CALIFORNIA LOWER COURTS VIOLATE 4th AMENDMENT RIGHTS IN LA

Last Modified: August 11, 2023
May 21, 2013 | Rabin Nabizadeh | Battery, Robbery, Theft

The United States Constitution protects citizens from unlawful search and seizure.  Part of what is known as the Bill of Rights, this amendment is meant to prevent law enforcement or government officials from fabricating evidence, planting evidence, or illegally obtaining evidence for later use against suspects in various crimes.  The 4th Amendment is also part and parcel of a balancing of governmental power with individual rights.

In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld these 4th Amendment rights, maintaining that, in non-emergent situations, police cannot enter an individual’s home without a warrant without permission.  Lower courts in California have, however, ruled that any resident – not just the suspect – can give that permission.  Now, the U.S. Supreme Court has accepted the Fermandez v. California 12-7822 on appeal.

In October of 2009, Los Angeles police officers were in the process of investigating a robbery and assault case when they heard screams and loud noises coming from Walter Fernandez’s apartment.  An injured woman answered the door when the police knocked, but Fernandez refused them entry and he was subsequently arrested. The woman gave permission for police to enter the abode, where evidence was found tying Fernandez to gang-related crimes. This evidence was key in his eventual conviction on charges of robbery (CA Penal Code §211) and domestic violence (CA Penal Code §273.5).  In fact, 10 of the 14 years of the jury’s sentence were a direct result of the evidence found that day.

There is no question concerning the protections offered by the 4th Amendment – they are clear and absolute.  Another resident of the same home cannot give permission for police to enter without a warrant; that action can only be taken by the individual that law enforcement officials suspect of a crime.   The decision made by the California Second District Court of Appeal, and lower courts before them, to uphold the search conducted in the Fernandez case will most certainly be overturned in the U.S. Supreme Court, where justices are bound by the U.S. Constitution, not to interpret the law as they please, but as it is written.

latest news

February 6, 2024
What Can I Expect After Being Arrested for a DUI in San Jose?

Getting arrested for a DUI in San Jose can be a stressful and confusing experience. You might have many questions about what happens next and what you should do. Knowing the process and what to expect can help you navigate this challenging situation. It’s important to remember that a DUI arrest is severe, and the […]

February 6, 2024
Effective DUI Defenses You Can Utilize

Facing a DUI charge can be a burdensome experience and frightening. You might feel like there’s no way to defend yourself, but that’s not true. There are several effective defenses that skilled DUI lawyers use to protect their clients. Understanding these defenses can be crucial in fighting a DUI charge. DUI defenses vary depending on […]

October 10, 2023
Do You Lose Your License Immediately After a DUI Charge in San Jose?

Driving under the influence (DUI) is a major offense in San Jose. If you’ve been arrested for a DUI, you might be worried about the future of your driver’s license. Following a DUI arrest, you might be wondering what to do next. Knowing your rights and the next steps can significantly impact the outcome of […]