Distribution of Child Pornography Charges Dropped under CA Penal Code §311.11

Rabin Nabizadeh
March 26, 2013

Judge Jerome Benson cut Gilbert Lam’s bail back from $250,000 to $80,000 due to lack of evidence that the 37-year-old had distributed the images of child pornography found in his home (CA PC311). It is not unusual for law enforcement officials in California to charge an individual with distribution of child pornography when such pornographic images are found on a personal computer.

This was exactly the case for Lam, whose home was searched this past August by San Francisco police.  The investigation was stymied for a number of months, however, because Lam had managed to deftly encrypt the files on his computer so as to make them nearly impossible to access.  When law enforcement officials finally followed up, prosecutor Alexis Fasteau tried to argue that the 83 suspicious video files found on Lam’s computer had most certainly been shared with others via a file-sharing program.  However, to Fastau’s dismay, there was absolutely no evidence to support the claim that Lam distributed the pornographic videos over the Internet; there was only proof that he shared the files between his own computers.

Although Lam has admitted to viewing certain videos containing child pornography, there has never been any evidence supporting the charges against him regarding their distribution.  CA Penal Code, §311.11 usually makes the simple possession of child pornography a felony charge carrying a maximum penalty of $50,000 in fines and/or up to 1 year in county jail.  However, the penalties for the distribution of child pornography can either be a misdemeanor or a felony (a ‘wobbler’) according to California law.  If considered a felony charge, a person faces state prison and/or a maximum fine of $10,000.

Summit Defense child pornography attorneys routinely defend both possession and distribution of child pornography cases.  Although, we’ve found it to be usual for prosecutors to charge persons with both possession and distribution of child pornography, it is also very likely that some of these charges can be removed due to lack of proper evidence. If you are facing a similar criminal charge, contact the attorneys at Summit Defense for a free initial consulation.

latest news

May 18, 2023
How To Beat a DUI in California

Being charged with a DUI in California is a serious matter. If you get convicted of a DUI, you spend time in jail, have your license suspended or revoked, and face significant fines and other penalties. A DUI conviction will also appear on your records, which might make it hard for you to secure housing […]

May 17, 2023
How To Defense Against a DUI in California

Driving under the influence has been a serious problem across the country for a long time, and it is good news that drunk driving rates have fallen significantly, particularly given the advent of ride-sharing apps. Unfortunately, there are still situations where drunk driving does occur, and everyone must understand their options if they are charged […]

May 16, 2023
How Much Does a DUI Cost in California?

Everyone needs to ensure they drive safely when they get behind the wheel of a car, which means they are not intoxicated. Even though it is good news that drunk driving rates have fallen significantly during the past few decades, it is also true that driving under the influence still happens. If you are convicted […]