Isla Vista Murder Spree May Change the Way Police Respond (CA Penal Code 187)

Last Modified: October 15, 2020
June 2, 2014 | Rabin Nabizadeh | Homicide, Murder

It’s been over a week since John Doe (name withheld in order to protect the privacy of the accused) went on a rage-fueled killing spree in Isla Vista, leaving lives and families destroyed in his wake.  The incident has left the public with quite a few questions, especially since it is now known that his parents were aware of the melancholy and violent videos he’d posted on YouTube.  More importantly, law enforcement officials spoke to him 3 weeks before the attacks and his subsequent suicide.  Based on a report in SFGate, the sheriff’s deputies that spoke to him did not check to see whether he owned guns, 2 guns were registered to him at that time.  Additionally, the police did not bother to check out the YouTube videos posted by him, even though his parents had alerted them to their existence.

Could this terrible string of senseless murders have been prevented?  Californians are asking the same questions that they did in 1969 when Tatiana Tarasoff was murdered by a fellow student (CA Penal Code 187), Prosenjit Poddar, after the police were instructed twice to pick him up and take him into custody so that he could be involuntarily hospitalized in a psychiatric ward.  The issues are clearly a bit different in this new case, but the actions of the police are similar. The police spoke to Poddar as well and he was able to convince them, just like John Doe, that there was nothing for them to worry about.  They were convinced, but they were also wrong to take the word of an individual over the evidence or behest of a professional or parent.

The deputies questioned him about the videos, though they had not seen them and accepted his explanation that he was simply a disgruntled college student blowing off some steam. However, clearly he was serious as he stabbed his three roommates to death and then drove off in his BMW toward a local sorority house, killing 6 people total by the time he shot himself.  California citizens and lawmakers are now considering, not only a full review of what occurred in this particular case, but also changes in how such situations are managed.  They ask whether or not the subjective viewpoints of one or two police officers are good enough.  What real changes will result remains to be seen.


latest news

February 27, 2024
What to Do if You’ve Been Arrested for a DUI in San Jose
Being arrested for a DUI in San Jose, CA, can have severe penalties, potentially resulting in jail time, losing your driver's license, and other serious consequences. Here's what to do if facing a DUI conviction after being accused of driving over the legal limit and how a California DUI lawyer can help you resolve your case with [...]
February 25, 2024
What Happens When You Get a DUI?
Getting a DUI (Driving Under the Influence) can be a stressful and life-changing event. It starts the moment a law enforcement officer suspects you've been drinking and driving. This can lead to being pulled over, undergoing a field sobriety test, and possibly being arrested. The consequences of a DUI arrest include legal action, potential jail [...]
February 6, 2024
What Can I Expect After Being Arrested for a DUI in San Jose?

Getting arrested for a DUI in San Jose can be a stressful and confusing experience. You might have many questions about what happens next and what you should do. Knowing the process and what to expect can help you navigate this challenging situation. It’s important to remember that a DUI arrest is severe, and the […]