Congress to Reconsider Restitution for Victims of Child Pornography (CA Penal Code 311.11)

Congress to Reconsider Restitution for Victims of Child Pornography (CA Penal Code 311.11)

Rabin Nabizadeh
August 8, 2014

In April of this year, the United States Congress made a controversial decision to almost entirely do away with restitution for victims of child pornography.  As can be imagined, there are parties that are quite unhappy about this particular decision.  Two of these are Democratic Senator Chuck Shumer (N.Y.) and Republican Orrin Hatch (Utah).  They have proposed what is often referred to as a Congressional ‘fix’ for the April decision (see S. 2301) concerning United States v. Paroline called the “Amy and Vicky Act.”

The Paroline decision (involving one Doyle Paroline 18) was based on United States Code 2252 and 259 (which states that restitution should be granted to anyone, in this case a minor female, who has been sexually abused in order to create child pornography).  The problematic issue revealed itself when the court decided that the defendant in the case, although in possession of child pornography (CA Penal Code 311.11) of the young girl, was not entirely responsible for her losses.

What victims of child pornography argue is at least twofold when it comes to the issue of restitution.  First, because modern-day technology allows pornographic images of children to be widely distributed for an indefinite amount of time, restitution should be significant enough to pay for, not only for medical, therapy, and loss of income, but also for emotional and punitive damages.  Second, victims and their advocates argue that restitution cannot be meaningful nor timely if those who have participated in the production of their illegal images can share in the cost, each paying just a small amount.

While the “Amy and Vicky Act” will prove controversial in and of itself, the debate continues as to how to handle restitution for victims of child pornography.  On one side, there are those who claim that restitution is enough of a burden already.  On the other, victims say that no restitution seems enough for a lifetime of exposure on the Internet.  

 

latest news

April 7, 2022
What Can I Expect After Being Arrested for a DUI in California?
A DUI charge is a severe criminal offense in California. DUI arrests take away a massive part of your driving privilege and could tarnish your reputation. Prior DUI convictions can inflict further damage to your career opportunities, driving rights, and immigration status. This blog will go over what you must expect when facing DUI charges. [...]
April 7, 2022
How Long Does a DUI Stay on Your Record in California?
DUI cases may stay on your criminal record forever. The United States sees DUI as a serious traffic crime punishable with grave penalties. Fighting your way through a DUI case is a challenging task. But, it doesn't mean you can't do anything about it. There are legal options available for you, depending on the nature [...]
April 6, 2022
Arrested for DUI in California: Am I Going to Lose My Job?
You've been charged with a DUI and have no idea what to do next. A lot of worries may run through your mind, including the fear of losing your job. Many aspects of a DUI charge can be overwhelming to a person, even to those familiar with California Law. In this blog, we will discuss [...]