Seattle: Possession of Child Pornography Case Thrown Out Due to Illegally Obtained Evidence (CA Penal Code 311.11)

Seattle: Possession of Child Pornography Case Thrown Out Due to Illegally Obtained Evidence (CA Penal Code 311.11)

Rabin Nabizadeh
September 15, 2014

Seattle resident (name withheld in order to protect the privacy) had already been sentenced to 18 years in state prison for his 2010 arrest for child pornography images found on his home computer (CA Penal Code 311.11)  Recently, a federal appeals court has overturned this decision, not because of witness tampering or incorrect jury instructions, because the information concerning hiscase had been obtained illegally.  It was, in fact, not local or federal law enforcement officials who caught jhim  Indeed, it was a Naval Criminal Investigative Service agent all the way in Georgia who searched, not only his computer, but many others in Washington State, in order to scan for images of child pornography.  Specifically, the computer program that was used found 2 photographs and one video on his computer.  The NCIS representative gave the information to the FBI, who then used a local search warrant to enter Dreyer’s home.  Dreyer was eventually brought up on federal charges as well, as the department of Homeland Security had also received the information from NCIS.

So, you may be thinking to yourself, “What’s the problem?  Someone caught him with these images, a legal warrant was obtained, he was arrested, and now sentenced.”  The issue is that the original NCIS sweep of computers in Washington State was entirely illegal.  Thus, the search warrant was also illegal.

But those military officials who were questioned about the legality of the search claimed that NCIS had the right to take a look at computers in Washington on the basis because they have the right to see what military personnel in the area are up to when it comes to child pornography.  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that, because he was not a member of the military and because the search was not solely conducted on computers belonging to military personnel, it was thus illegal and the entire case must be thrown out.  Their decision was based on a rather old piece of legislation, dating from 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act.  This Act was passed into law to prevent the military from sticking its proverbial nose into non-military legal matters.  If the military and its long arms were able to reach into the homes and computers of civilian citizens and then to turn them in to local law enforcement agencies, then this would cause a great deal of trouble indeed.

 

latest news

May 18, 2022
Why Term Papers For Sale May Not Be For You

In regards to faculty, many students search for and try out free term papers available on various websites. They are offered free of charge and a number of websites also offer it available with a few terms

April 7, 2022
What Can I Expect After Being Arrested for a DUI in California?
A DUI charge is a severe criminal offense in California. DUI arrests take away a massive part of your driving privilege and could tarnish your reputation. Prior DUI convictions can inflict further damage to your career opportunities, driving rights, and immigration status. This blog will go over what you must expect when facing DUI charges. [...]
April 7, 2022
How Long Does a DUI Stay on Your Record in California?
DUI cases may stay on your criminal record forever. The United States sees DUI as a serious traffic crime punishable with grave penalties. Fighting your way through a DUI case is a challenging task. But, it doesn't mean you can't do anything about it. There are legal options available for you, depending on the nature [...]