Voluntary Manslaughter Charge under PC 192(a) in Livermore Road Rage Incident

March 15, 2013 | Rabin Nabizadeh | Vehicular Homicide, Voluntary Manslaughter

Cort Holbrook, a software engineer out of Livermore, was out about town when he noticed that Ricky Zeismer was driving erratically and causing dangerous issues with the traffic ahead.  The two eventually pulled over and got into a serious scuffle, with Holbrook receiving several kicks and punches from Zeismer.  The road rage incident ended only when Holbrook felt it necessary to stab Zeismer, resulting in his eventual death, in order to protect himself.  Holbrook certainly has the cuts and bruises to prove it.

Alameda County prosecutors attempted to charge Holbrook with 2nd degree murder, but were unsuccessful.  Instead, a charge of “voluntary manslaughter” was entered and Holbrook will serve somewhere between 4 and 12 years in a California state prison for his actions.

California Penal Code, §192(a) speaks to voluntary manslaughter and the criteria for such a charge are quite specific.  In order to be considered voluntary manslaughter, a killing must be committed under certain circumstances – such as a sudden altercation or in the heat of the moment, when passions are high.  Furthermore, it must be proven that the accused was provoked and had no choice but to have an irrational response.  “Sufficient provocation” is key in these types of cases and, though it is ill defined, the level of provocation must be high in order to enter this defense.

A charge of voluntary manslaughter – as opposed to the far more serious 2nd degree murder – means the difference between a maximum of 11 years in state prison versus life imprisonment or even execution.  Following the argument of the criminal defense attorney, the jury agreed with Holbrook – that he acted in self-defense, was sufficiently provoked, and that he acted in the heat of the moment when he chose to take out his knife to protect himself against Zeismer.

If you or someone you know is facing charges of vehicular homicide contact a criminal defense attorney at the San Jose, San Francisco, Oakland or Burlingame offices of Summit Defense Attorneys for free initial consultation.

latest news

May 14, 2025
Will the Prosecutor Talk to My Lawyer or to Me?
When you're facing criminal charges, one of the first things you might wonder is whether the prosecutor will speak to your lawyer or you directly. It's a fair question, especially if you're feeling stressed, unsure about your rights, or worried about saying the wrong thing. The truth is, who the prosecutor can speak to depends on [...]
May 14, 2025
Is a Public Defender a Real Lawyer?
If you can't afford a lawyer, the court will appoint a public defender—but are they as good as a private attorney? This question bothers many people facing criminal charges. Yes, public defenders are real lawyers with law degrees and bar licenses. However, there are big differences between public defenders and private criminal defense attorneys that [...]
May 13, 2025
Is There a Difference Between Sealing and Expunging Juvenile Records?
If you had trouble with the law as a minor, you might be wondering whether those records can ever go away. Whether you're applying for college, a job, or a license, your past may follow you. That's where sealing or expunging comes in, but they aren’t the same. Summit Defense Criminal Lawyers helps individuals clear [...]