Vacaville High School Teacher Accused of Lewd Acts with a Minor (CA Penal Code §288)

May 10, 2013 | Rabin Nabizadeh | Lewd Conduct, Sex Crime Registration, Sex Crimes

After several interviews and checking the text messages on the phone of a young girl, a warrant was put out for the arrest of Rodney Orosco, 47, an English teacher at Vacaville High. Orosco turned himself in to authorities upon learning of the warrant, but it remains to be seen whether he acted in a manner inappropriate enough to justify the charges against him.

In the state of California, Penal Code §288 covers “lewd acts with a minor” and, in cases like that of Orosco, the mind of the public goes to the worst possible places – that the child’s sexual organs were touched or that the child was fondled in some other improper manner.  However, what many Californians do not know is that these charges can be levied against a person who has not touched a child in a sexual manner at all.  For example, in Orosco’s case, the grandparent of the child in question saw him carry the girl across the stage at Vacaville High’s school theater.  Other circumstantial evidence seems to suggest that Orosco may have kissed the girl on three separate occasions.

Yet, is this enough substantial proof to ruin the career and life of Mr. Orosco, who seems by all accounts to be cooperating with the investigation against him?  It seems that charges of inappropriate behavior are becoming more and more common in California high schools in the past few years. Does this mean that there are more sexual offenders becoming teachers or does it mean, on the other hand, that there may be a trend forming – that academic pursuits have become so competitive that students are willing to do almost anything in order to get ahead?  Whatever the case, there is at least an argument to be made that California laws pursuant to Penal Code §288 go too far when someone like Orosco, a potentially caring and interested teacher, must deal with allegations of this kind.

latest news

April 14, 2025
What is the exclusionary rule?
At Summit Defense, our criminal defense attorneys know that the exclusionary rule protects your Constitutional rights when facing criminal charges. This legal rule stops police officers from using evidence they got through illegal searches. When a law enforcement official breaks the law while gathering evidence, courts can order the evidence inadmissible, preventing its use against [...]
April 13, 2025
Can the police search a car that has been towed?
Police searches of vehicles are common in criminal cases. But many people don’t know their rights when a car gets towed or impounded. A big question we often hear is: Can police officers search a towed vehicle without a warrant? This question involves your constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment. Police may claim a legal basis for searching a car [...]
April 13, 2025
Can tangible evidence be admitted if it was discovered because of a Miranda violation?
If the police arrest you and ask questions without reading your Miranda Rights, anything you say might be tossed out. But what if that statement leads to a gun, drugs, or other tangible evidence? Can that still be used in court? The answer isn’t simple. Courts often treat statements and physical evidence differently. While a statement may be excluded after a Miranda violation, [...]